Web-Based Intervention Proposal Paper

 

Guidelines
PURPOSE
The purpose of this application is to provide the student an opportunity to develop a Web-based intervention proposal.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO6: Examine current information technology systems that are considered best practice in healthcare delivery, especially related to quality and patient safety (PO #6).

CO8: Synthesize existing and emerging information systems that support evidence-based clinical decision making for quality improvement (PO #7).

CO9: Apply informatics and information systems concepts to the advanced nursing practice role (PO #7).

CO10: Formulate strategies using healthcare technology and informatics to improve patient safety and health outcomes for quality improvement of advanced nursing practice (PO #6).

POINTS
This assignment is worth a total of 275 points.
DUE DATE
Submit your completed application under the Dropbox tab by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 7 as directed.
REQUIREMENTS
1. To complete this application, you will need access to the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. You may access these databases through the Chamberlain College of Nursing Online Library. The library has a main menu available at http://library.chamberlain.edu/libraryhome with a link for Research Help in the left-hand menu.
2. The Web-Based Intervention Proposal paper will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.
3. Create your manuscript using Microsoft Word 2010 (a part of Microsoft Office 2010), which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Nursing documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word 2010 document because it will end in “.docx.”
4. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
5. The length of the paper is to be no less than 6 and no greater than 8 pages excluding title page and reference pages.
6. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface).
Note: Introduction – Write an introduction to the Web-based intervention proposal, but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered):
a. Introduction to the Web-based intervention proposal
b. Description of PICOT elements necessary for the proposed online intervention
c. Reflection on the application from a Health Information Technology (HIT) perspective
d. Conclusion
PREPARING THE PAPER
The following are best practices for preparing this paper:
1. When introducing the Web-based intervention, be sure to identify appropriate background information regarding the proposed online interventions (who, what, where, when, and why).
2. When describing the proposed PICOT, be sure to fully describe each element using current evidence and how the proposed online interventions could be achieved if implemented.
3. When reflecting on the proposed online interventions, be sure to fully justify the proposal from a Health Information Technology (HIT) perspective.
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA
Category Points % Description
Introduction to the Web-based intervention 30 11 Introduces the purpose of the paper and addresses all background information elements for the proposed Web-based intervention.
Description of the proposed PICOT 55 20 Individually address each element of the proposed intervention using PICOT, with current evidence and discussion of how the proposed online interventions could be achieved if implemented.

Reflection on the Web-based intervention from a HIT perspective 55 20 Fully justify the Web-based intervention proposal from a Health Information Technology (HIT) perspective.
Conclusion 30 11 An effective conclusion identifies the main ideas and major conclusions from the body of your manuscript. Minor details are left out. Summarize benefits of the Web-based intervention proposal for the improvement and transformation of healthcare.
Clarity of writing 50 18 Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
APA format 55 20 All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (6th ed.) format:
1. Document setup
2. Title and reference pages
3. Citations in the text and references.
Total: 275
100
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria
Introduction to the Web-based intervention
(30 pts.) Excellent introduction of selected Web-based intervention. Rationale is well presented and purpose fully developed.
27–30 points Basic understanding and/or limited understanding of purpose for selected Web-based intervention and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area.
23–26 points Little or very general introduction of selected Web-based intervention. Little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area.
0–22 points
Description of the proposed PICOT
(55 pts.) Excellent discussion of each PICOT element. Discussion of how the proposed online interventions could be achieved if implemented is supported with examples.
50–55 points Basic discussion of each PICOT element. Discussion of how the proposed online interventions could be achieved if implemented is not supported with examples.
42–49 points Little or very general discussion of PICOT element. Little or no discussion of how the proposed online interventions could be achieved if implemented, or discussion not supported with examples.
0–41 points
Reflection on the Web-based intervention from a HIT perspective
(55 pts.) Excellent discussion of Web-based intervention from a HIT perspective. Reflection is supported with practice situation examples.
50–55 points Basic discussion of Web-based intervention from a HIT perspective and/or reflection not supported with practice situation examples.
42–49 points Little or very general discussion of Web-based intervention from a HIT perspective, or little or no reflection and/or practice situation examples.
0–41 points
Conclusion
(30 pts.) Excellent understanding of potential Web-based intervention contributions to the improvement and transformation of healthcare. Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed.
27–30 points Basic understanding and/or limited perspective regarding potential Web-based intervention contributions to the improvement and transformation of healthcare.
23–26 points Little or no understanding of potential Web-based intervention contributions to the improvement and transformation of healthcare; inappropriate emphasis on an area.
0–22 points
Clarity of writing
(50 pts.) Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.
45–50 points Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.
38–44 points Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.
0–37 points
APA format

(55 pts.) APA format correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors.
50–55 points 3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations are missing.
42–49 points APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0–41 points
Total Points Possible = 275 points

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us” Use the following coupon FIRST15

Posted in Uncategorized