The Cherokee removal was an involuntary regulation application of the Native Americans and the Indians. The implementation of the regulations act was an attempt to establish an independent country that would otherwise dominate the Georgian city. The proceeding of the law was enacted by the legislature that proceeded over the extended jurisdiction where Indian Cherokees demanded legal actions that would facilitate the functions of the petitioned supreme court of the United States of America. The populace of the Georgian region was undermined as domestic nations that were entirely regarded as a dependent nation that would not have survived of a trail of effective government formation. The circumstances demanded a legal intervention that would clarify the state and the save the population of the wrath of isolation and a possibility of land alienation.
The formulation of the Worcester vs. Georgia cases were generally drafted as a federal protection schemes that would work in favor of the Cherokee population which was a composition of the Indian population and also an alienated population of the Native American. The success of the Cherokee removal was a documentation devised after the appropriated planning for the segregation of the Native race of the American population. The mastermind of the entire schemes was President Andrew who had a hand in the enactment of the Indian removal act and thee enforcement of the same regulation. The Marshall’s decision was of no significance to the president’s game plane and this effected that the same would have been dully enforced on the Indian population of Cherokee.
. The establishment of the treaties was a str5ategy to certify the federal government’s approach on the matter. The approach to seal the treaty as amended and sealed by the use of the Cherokee chiefs who would have to comply with the rules of the land. This would effectively capture the Indian population occupying the land as this was a mandatory requirement. Through these protocols, the federal government would effetely control the native population and completely ensure that the regulations would have to be enhanced to all with maximum restrictions and observation of respect to the nation’s laws. The congress was widely used to activate the treaties signed by the Cherokee chiefs. This can be overviewed as a direct way to sabotage the functionality of the popular voice in a pattern to conquer the independent mind. The main objective of the plans was to declare victory of the removal of the Cherokee population from America despite the obstruction and overruled jurisdiction of the United States legislative systems
The removal of the Indians plan was characterized by major barriers and challenges from the main populations as spirited efforts were designed to ensure that the laws were tampered with the treaties dishonored. The relationship between the Native Americans and Cherokee Indians led to the development of collaborated resistance of the entire federal government scheme. The three key chiefs that signed the removal treaty were murdered by the Native American and the Indians so as to safe guard the interest of a larger population. The repercussions of the killings by the Natives and the Indians resulted to a massive retaliation by the Federal Government that pushed the populations into the West. The land which is presently referred to as the land of the trailed fears of land historical background became home to the Native Americans and Cherokee Indians.
The factors for the failure of the Cherokee nation can be traced back to a lack of a significant cooperation of the two involved governments. The forced resettlement of the Cherokee population to the west region of America was a great deviation of the nation’s population leading to a misunderstanding between the nations. The forced relocation impacted negatively to the current nation of America’s nation and has greatly eroded the American culture and identity of the minority population. The overall summary of the removal of the Cherokee nation has also impacted on the negative treatment by other races within the American nation due to the historical records that have been misinterpreted in the recent history and generation.
The illustration of the Cherokee nation has been absorbed as a practical example of discrimination and misinterpretation of the law by supreme bodies or individuals who have a difference of opinion that generally discriminates against the less fortunate. The Cherokee removal was an involuntary regulation application of the Native Americans and the Indians. The implementation of the regulations act was an attempt to establish an independent country that would otherwise dominate the Georgian city. The analysis of the cases between Worcester v. Georgia has been criticized over the last years describing the outcome possibilities that would have been alternatively approved to salvage the minority races that would have enabled a peaceful coexistence between America. This would have also created a simple American history that would have appreciated thee different races and groups in America.
Work CitedGold, Susan D. Worcester V. Georgia: Native American Rights. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2009. Print.
Aaseng, Nathan. Cherokee Nation V. Georgia. San Diego, CA: Lucent Books, 2000. Print.
Day, Charmaine L. Worcester V. Georgia: Cherokees, the American Board and the Nullification Crisis. , 2006. Print.