State the research problem and ensure it is supported by at least 3 to 5 scholarly resources within the past 5 years to ensure relevancy.

Summarize Numerical Data

For this assignment, think about a potential study you might want to conduct in which you would need to collect numerical data. You can use the research topic and problem you developed earlier, but make sure to modify your research questions to fit a quantitative method for this assignment.

  • State the research problem and ensure it is supported by at least 3 to 5 scholarly resources within the past 5 years to ensure relevancy. Also keep in mind that your problem statement should reflect your degree (applied or PhD). Discuss whether you had to alter the problem statement to now reflect a quantitative design.
  • How could you use quantitative methodology to address your research problem?
  • State the purpose of the research effort. Make sure the purpose is aligned with the problem.
  • Draft 2 to 3 research questions that would be appropriate for a quantitative study and addresses your research problem and are aligned with your purpose statement. You might choose to revise your previous qualitative research questions or develop new research questions. Either way, ensure alignment with the problem and purpose.
  • Identify and discuss a design that is associated with quantitative methodology that you would consider to answer your research questions.
  • You will find that some problems lend themselves to using one methodology over another. A goal of this assignment was to have you explore how a quantitative methodology might help you address your research questions. You will have an opportunity later in the course to explore mixed methodologies. Based on your analysis above, do you feel the use of a quantitative methodology and your chosen design is best suited to address your research problem and answer your questions. Why or why not?

Be sure to use scholarly sources to support all assertions and research decisions.

Length: 3-5 pages

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral Universitys Academic Integrity Policy.

 

Dane, F.C. (2011) Evaluating research: Methodology for people who need to read research.
Read Chapter 4 (pp. 79-103)
Krathwohl, D. (2009) Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods.
Read Chapter 17 (pp. 369-398) and Chapter 18 (pp. 369-427)
Articles
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Par 1: Quantitative research.

http://keiranhenderson.com/articulate/Critiquing_research/data/downloads/critiquing_quantitative_research_bjn.pdf

Read article
Dunning, T. (2008). Improving causal inference: Strengths and limitations of natural experiments.

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us” Use the following coupon FIRST15

Posted in Uncategorized