Student’s name
Tutor
Course
Date
Part 1: Researching Quality Information about Coates’ Essay
Summarizing Sources
Sources in research aid in the generation of ideas and the examination of a certain topic. According to Katrina Forester, author of “Reparations, History, and the Origins of Global Justice,” Ta-Nehisi Coates rekindled an ancient discussion over restitution due to African Americans as a result of slavery. The author’s major point is to show how the turn of the century has resulted in an increase in preparation for restitution claims (Coates, 10). According to the author, Coates’ contributions were the most widely discussed, igniting a new round of discussion. Senator Bernie Sanders, for example, was attacked by Coates because, during his campaign for the Democratic Presidential nomination, he expressed a socialist skepticism that was acquainted with reparations claims that advocated “universal” welfare systems that work on class rather than racial lines. Katrina Forrester, the author is a Harvard University associate professor of Government and Social Studies. She is also a political theorist and historian having scholarly interests in 20th century political and social thought.
The major objective of Lewis Thabiti’s “How Fresh and New is the Case Coates Makes?” is to provide his thoughts on Coates’ “Between the World and Me,” and he indicated that he appreciates the articles (Lewis 195). The purpose of this study is to provide an examination of the strategies, goals, and why a certain methodology resonates well with certain segments of the public but not with others. The author encourages researchers to always look for an appeal that goes beyond the same book that has been around for years. Lewis Thabiti, the author is an English assistant professor at Washington University of states, where he lectures contemporary American literature as well as Black American literature.
Evaluating Sources
A person can learn a variety of topics by researching Coate’s essay. One of the most important aspects is that people have diverse perspectives on assessing the work of others. Each person’s interpretation is based on their comprehension of the read content. I can answer a riddle by understanding how something works and why certain events occur. As a result, I’ve learnt to respond to people’s inquiries regarding a certain topic. This is one of the most important things I’ve learnt. I have discovered that it is critical to identify valuable resources while performing research and that preliminary research is necessary to inspire a person’s thoughts. Identifying relevant sources allows a person to perform a more systematic search that is more focused on informative primary and secondary sources. As a result, finding secondary sources is critical in a research effort.
The research has provided me with a viable approach of learning and researching a certain issue. Another important lesson I learnt from conducting the research was the importance of assessing information sources. Before I began writing the report, I needed to find reputable information sources from which to obtain the necessary information. Since the articles were properly searched, it is simple to write a worthwhile paper. I can tell the difference between sources that can be trusted and those that cannot help me make the best decision about which resources to employ. As a result, I learned to examine and analyze every source and the information included within it. Learning to focus on key concerns was also an important lesson I gained. Finding the correct sources for a research paper is one of the most difficult tasks due to the necessity for complete concentration on a primary subject. A person must conduct research on the subject matter. A person investigates the topic matter by studying several papers, articles, and publications. To ensure that they are heading in the proper path, a researcher must always have the focus in mind.
As a result of considering what several writers have to say about a topic, a person develops a questioning perspective. After considering several points of view from other writers, a person learns how to study the situation and identify the most efficient answers. The abilities will assist future study and the creation of publications that effectively explain the points of view of several writers. Due to the general quality of the source, it is worth considering the New Yorker’s story on reparations. The New Yorker frequently has the most recent information and conducts extensive research on the country’s top news. The report is also reputable because of its publishing date, which indicates that it contains the most recent updates on restitution. Furthermore, the discourse in the report has been carefully trimmed and shortened to highlight the most recent information on reparations. According to the article, democratic presidential contenders regard slavery reparations as a more important issue than other Americans. As a result, society has to be better informed about the need for reparations (Coates, 30).
Part 2: Evidence Clusters from “The Case for Reparations”
According to a New Yorker piece, the pirated properties of people of color have benefited governmental and private organizations in the US. Racism in the United States of America is being supported by institutions with a US history. Similarly, while discussing the underlying inequalities between white and black inhabitants of the United States, Coates refers to the “Injury Gap”. Coates refers to the current racial forms of poverty as the “Injury Gap.” Coates contends that ignoring the injury gap in today’s society is a form of deception used to cover up the error of national failures. Lies widely held by whites say that closing the wealth gap between affluent and poor Americans would have no effect on racial poverty. However, the accomplishment difference is obvious in the labor market. Graduates of color experience greater unemployment rates in the United States than white graduates. Furthermore, graduates of color with no criminal history have a worse likelihood of finding work than white graduates with underlying criminal backgrounds. A history gap, according to Coates, is the amount of harm done to people of color that previous constitutional amendments have failed to rectify (Coates, 22).
Additionally, the Guardians article by Bukiempis and Oliver Laughland states that reparations have been apparent in the United States since the civil war. Similarly, Coates used a quotation from John Wilkes Booth to emphasize how slavery remained after the Civil War. After the country had recovered from the civil war, Booth killed President Abraham Lincoln. Coates uses Booth as a metaphor to show the culture of the United States. Coates, Booth is a symbol of white culture connected with prolonged slavery after the country earned independence and peace once the Civil War came to a conclusion. Even though the United States is a free country with no visible continuing civil conflicts, the government is nonetheless subject to slavery, which whites are unable to confront. As a result, Coates labels the treatment of people of color in the United States as terrorism (Coates, 25).
Coates also uses the term pogrom to depict black slavery as a slaughter of African Americans in the United States. In the actual world, a pogrom is a slaughter targeting a certain ethnic group of individuals with the goal of eradicating the group. Reparations are intended to recompense people of color for destroying their neighborhoods, such as the black Wall Street, which was only populated by people of color. As a result, paying descendants of previous slaves is backed by widespread evidence of displacement and loss of black people’s property.
Part 3: Do you Believe Coates?
I believe in Coates’ thoughts based on my research on the subject of reparations. According to the data presented in the New Yorker piece, institutions with a history in the United States are related with severe racism. Property belonging to public institutions, including land, was seized from people of color. Coates uses the current Wall Street scenario as proof. Wall Street was originally owned by the Tutsi community. Racists, on the other hand, evicted the Tutsi and built various public facilities in the region. Paradoxically, public institutions built on property that once belonged to people of color are more valuable to white people than to people of color. As a result, Coates examines the concept of the injury gap. The injury gap is produced by the slaughter of people of color and the removal of their goods by white people. As a result, the descendants of black slaves must be rewarded in order to bridge the gap between the affluent and the poor. Paying people of color for the suffering and loss inflicted on their forefathers would be critical in closing the achievement gap (Coates, 45).
According to the Guardian article by Bekimpse and Laughland, reparations would close the income gap between low and middle-class Americans. Individuals of color have the highest number of impoverished people in the country because they are the most disadvantaged in the job-seeking business (Bekiempis, et. al, 48). Reparations would allow blacks to get beyond the poverty line by improving their standard of living. Slavery persisted despite the end of the Civil War. Thus, the civil war was ended to favor white people, while blacks considered an exceptional minority. As a result, reparations will help erase racial imbalances in the country since they are a way of apologizing to racial minorities for their harm.
Work Cited
Bekiempis, Victoria, and Oliver Laughland. “Ta-Nehisi Coates Revisits Case For Reparations, Five Years After Landmark Essay.” The Guardian, 2019.
Coates, T. N. “Ta-Nehisi Coates revisits the case for reparations.” The New Yorker (2019).
Coates, Ta-Nehisi. The case for reparations. Columbia University Press, 2015.
Forrester, Katrina, and Duncan Bell. “Reparations, history and the origins of global justice.” Empire, race and global justice (2019): 22-51.
Lewis, Thabiti. “How Fresh and New is the Case Coates Makes?.” African American Review 49.3 (2016): 192-196.
