Is there anything immoral with offering unauthorized immigrants a path to citizenship
Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course Title
Date
Is there anything immoral with offering unauthorized immigrants “a path to citizenship”?
This is the response to topic 2 question. In the quest to answer the query, it does suggest reasoning about certain specific aspects from what the rule of law defines and the modest common sense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with giving a pathway to citizenship; the big question is that under which specific lawful conditions and arguments is that kind of citizenship given to someone? With continents such as South America and Europe, particularly S. America with the situation of Venezuela, painting a disturbing image of immigration that is on large-scale. In the European situation, it occurs from different nations towards the continent of Europe; in the situation of South America, it happens from Venezuela to different neighboring nations, the ones preferred the most are Chile, Colombia, Argentina, Peru, and Ecuador.
In giving a path to citizenship, what considerations of nations that get immigrants put during that time. This situation contains profound consequences for the country’s populaces that give nationality and for immigrants as well. These Immigrants generally are viewed as a competition, particularly in the places of work; however, at the same period, they pose a big risk in their relocation from one country to a different one. In the case of Venezuela specifically, Venezuelans that are spread all over S. America have been exposed to xenophobia, robberies, crimes, and racism, amongst others. Thus the condition is truly complex. I am of the view that the negative thing that would be isn’t to gauge the immigrants’ situation properly, the effect that the immigrants arriving in every country may have. The impact doesn’t have to be negative every time since it’s also true that many immigrants donate their effort to the country’s economic growth. What’s the number of immigrants that the United States possesses? Most of the U.S labor force is Latin.
Should children illegally brought to a country ever be deported?
The query will be under what kind of arguments? It comes back again into the same theme: Are the children covered under a lawful framework? Do contradictions exist in the middle of these lawful frameworks? What is the action to take if it’s established that somebody was funded to take the children to a specific country that is outside their own? When thinking about the issue, all these queries must be asked. Irregular migrant kids or youngsters have been exposed continuously to human rights abuses for the reason that national policies and rules to uneven regulator migration are in need of approaches compatible with children. These migrants’ children are in the middle of two contrasting legal contexts, which are the one of control and the one of protection, and the nations breaking their international responsibilities in the human rights subject don’t offer an effective reply to their requirements as kids. Hence it’s very hard to deliberate an immediate response to the query due to the number of factors that are involved. I trust that a totally detailed international laws review ought to be formed so that to make sure there is an assurance of improved living environments for these immigrants’ kids, and the proposed solutions shouldn’t put their mental and physical integrity at risk.
